In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development
It is common argued by some toward the issue related to the replacement of face-to-face shopping, working and communication by online methods. I am of the opinion that this trend is bringing significant benefits for our society because it has saved a lot of valuable funds and reduced the amount of unwanted consumption.
On the one hand, my stance stems from the most persuasive online mechanism’s merit is that people in society can save a huge amount of time and money by working, purchasing, or even information transferring online. By using the internet as a convenient channel to flexibly select product that shoppers are seeking, many may save time to go the shop places to consider which ones to buy in wasting hours in long queues. In addition, many are benefited by home-based working chances without costly travelling on the road to their distant workplaces. For example, while a plenty of shopping fans can just stay at home to pick their fabulous cloths on the Amazon site, designers can chat with fellows and accompany their drawings then submits these to bosses via company’s online portal without commuting.
Another conspicuous reason why I am in favor of using internet instead of face-to-face commercial is that over-consumption can be diminished significantly. In traditional method of shopping, consumers tend to buy more than their needs. While females usually get lost in the variety of jewelries, men often seem to buy unwanted high-tech devices when they going to electronic shops. Nowadays, due to the online based technology, it seems to minimize the amount of money spent in these products, hence save the costumer’s budgets. For instance, a housewife, who are looking for a kitchen ware, will avoid the distraction by various skirts which may be showed in the next store if she goes to the nearby shopping mall.
In conclusion, it is often believed by many who agree with my point is that the positive influences created by internet are significant for shopping, working, and communication purposes. This is because of minimizing costs in these activities and wasting consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | Nivedha_palani | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Habui | 22 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | Maudgil | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-19 | kiddomiddo | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | thuyduong896 | 78 | view |
- Essay 5: Some people believe that famous people’s support towards international aid organisations draw attention to problems and contribute significantly for their achievements. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment. What causes global warming? What solution is there to this problem? 89
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development 100
- Parent often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up? 67
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...lect product that shoppers are seeking, many may save time to go the shop places to cons...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, may, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03704772685 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597101449275 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9507662329 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.307692308 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5384615385 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17261595131 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548810657468 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546752036744 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106823385729 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277818525076 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.