Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education plays an important role in our life in the past, present, and future. Teachers are the machine that controls this system, and most of the people see teachers as the role model for their life. They broad our horizon and widen our perspectives. All generation are appreciated and respect teacher in all decade and this for several reasons.
To begin with, now a days as in the past the students are ambitious to attend school. They looking forward to see their teachers and follow them and this al because of good impression left by their friends or big brothers and sisters how the teachers are so valued person and lovely one. My little one is a good example of this, Lara was 2 years old once she see her big brother go to school, she’s keep crying ask to go too. This was since she meets her brother’s teacher and keeps playing with her teacher her some letters and gift her some books too. Lara appreciated for this teacher all her life till she attends the school. Teacher still till our time most appreciated person.
Second, all nations celebrate and evaluate the teachers in special day called teacher day. All students are waiting for this day eagerly to value their teachers. Since decade this day is the most important day for all students as well the parents. I recall this day till now, it was my precious moment to give a huge to my teacher and give her a simple appreciation gift.
In sum, I strongly disagree with this statement. The teachers always appreciated and still will be and this can be sense by ambition of students to attend the school and national teacher day that hold in almost all nations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-18 | mohammadkmi | 76 | view |
2019-12-18 | marysv | 76 | view |
2019-11-26 | peymankaz | 73 | view |
2019-11-11 | Sinor | 73 | view |
2019-09-19 | ghazalsaed1995 | 73 | view |
- playing games teach us about life. agree or disagree 70
- dinasaours 3
- you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. Use 76
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first European to see one. In 1768 the animal became ext 78
- Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. Agree or disagree? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...is for several reasons. To begin with, now a days as in the past the students are ambitio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...or several reasons. To begin with, now a days as in the past the students are ambitio...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to seeing'.
Suggestion: to seeing
... to attend school. They looking forward to see their teachers and follow them and this...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'sees'.
Suggestion: sees
... of this, Lara was 2 years old once she see her big brother go to school, she'...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, still, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 292.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63356164384 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.392703595 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517123287671 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9152052745 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5625 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127255489551 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550471122121 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317275993388 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882247329288 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258412820737 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.