In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Some people argue that the significant amount of money should be considered as a construction budget to develop fast trains railways, while others believe in the improvement of existing public transport. I fundamentally agree with the first group and developing fast trains paths, but I think the improvement of current public transportation system could be done simultaneously.
First of all, it should be stuck in mind that modern technology advances such as fast trains, have brought more welfare and eases for people. To be more precise, fast trains as a modern transportation system allow people to commute faster and easier and reduce the time that people spend in traffic jams.
According to latest figures, in big cities such as Hong Kong, each person spends about 2-3 hours travelling from home to work and vice versa. By using modern trains this time would reduce to less than 1 hour which has countless benefits for people, especially for employees. Commentators believe that the efficiency or workforce will increase considerably.
On the other hand, since the development process of new railways and also the production of fast trains is a long-term process and might need several years, it is essential to modify the current transport system as soon as possible. In fact, a specific budget should be considered to reconstruct the existing transportation system. I disagree with the view that just new fast trains should be focused and present problems ignored.
Taking everything into consideration, certainly it seems that developing the new fast trains should be the first priority and special budget should be devoted but the improvement of existing can be done in parallel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The bar chart details the amount of waste that was disposed via landfill burning and dumping at sea in a particular European country between 2005 and 2008 61
- The chart below shows the number of films produced five countries in three years. 61
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 67
- you recently attend a meeting at a hotel. when you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel. say where you think you left papersexplain why they are so importanttell the manager what you want him/her to do 73
- Your rental accommodation was recently damaged due to bad weather Write a letter to the landlord and sya Explain what caused the damage Why do you need them to fix the problem right away What needs to be done to fix it 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the latest'.
Suggestion: to the latest
...le spend in traffic jams. According to latest figures, in big cities such as Hong Kon...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, i think, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27205882353 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89171648359 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7367090239 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.363636364 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369268770196 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138652880471 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985757763627 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200968733151 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979331518305 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.