Fossil fuels(e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative effect?
Nowadays, many hold the view that using alternative energy is beneficial to the society, whereas there is a body of view holding that this alternative energy does harm to the public. I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that using alternative resource may reduce some environmental pollution, since the replacement of the traditional fuels could decrease the greenhouse gas emissions in the air like carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, two main factors of global warming. In addition, using the alternative resource helps to alleviate energy crisis, for the new energy is renewable and gives the conventional fuels chances to be preserved to be standby energy.
On the other hand, however, alternative resource is low efficient, as the modern technology is not advanced enough to completely exploit the new resource and put it into use in industrial activities with high efficiency. Furthermore, using the new energy source is normally expensive. The reason is that the machine powered by the alternative energy source is always specially made, which means that the raw material of the device is rare and costs factories a fortune to collect.
To sum up, there is no doubt that the new resource is beneficial to improving the quality of the air and helps to solve the problem of energy crisis. At the same time, however, alternative resource is low efficient and commonly costs the civilians a fortune to use. In the final analysis, therefore, one can safely conclude that using the alternative resource influences the society positively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-12 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Frank Chen | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house price in 1989. 78
- There is a controversial view about whether group learning or independent learning is a better way to students’ study at school. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate and give my opinion. 73
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that using alternative energy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, may, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in fact, no doubt, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15769230769 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87616968745 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561538461538 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8240837384 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.1 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269927942037 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106028174532 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709238329607 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160404593638 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040121085098 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.