The charts below show the average wages of managerial and general staff and the profits of the company TRN between 2000 and 2003.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart and given line graph demonstrates clearly the information about the managers' and the workers' average salaries also the profits that the company TRN had gained for 3 years, from 2000 to 2003.
As we can see from the bar chart that in the first 2 years, managers' salary was nearly doubled comparing to the workers' wages. In the last year of 20th century, the average wages of managers was around $1,300 while that of staff was only $700. The salary of managers increased gradually to $1,400 in the first year before having grown up dramatically for a year. In the last year, the average still rose sharply up to over $ 1,800 per week. In contrast, the general staffs' incomes had increased slightly and gradually for the whole 3 years and at the end of the survey, employees' incomes stood at nearly $ 800 per week.
In 2000, the money that the company gained was 2 million dollars. After a year, the profits number of the company still in the same level after going up to around 2.5 million and decreasing back to the started level. For the last two years, there was an up-ward trend. the number of profits of TRN grew up remarkably and stood at around 4.5 million dollars in the year of 2003.
Overall, there was an up-ward trend for both salary and profits. However, there was a noticeable gap between the average wages of manager and staffs.
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 67
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 73
- Economic growth and development are usually considered to be beneficial both for individuals and for society as a whole.Do the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Do you agree or disagree that improvements in technology reduce the role of Olympic Games 62
- The charts below show the average wages of managerial and general staff and the profits of the company TRN between 2000 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the average wages of managers was around ,300 while that of staff was only 00. The...
^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...alary of managers increased gradually to ,400 in the first year before having grow...
^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...e average still rose sharply up to over $ 1,800 per week. In contrast, the general ...
^^^
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$800'.
Suggestion: $800
...rvey, employees incomes stood at nearly $ 800 per week. In 2000, the money that th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...omes stood at nearly $ 800 per week. In 2000, the money that the company gained...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... two years, there was an up-ward trend. the number of profits of TRN grew up remark...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59259259259 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25266189895 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489711934156 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3947959572 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146860032866 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607033054776 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569026509923 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108123916635 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550586503218 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.