The chart compares the proportion of citizens living alone in 5 age groups from 17 to 64 years old in America during a 150 – year period since 1850.
Overall, the figure for people living alone increased gradually through the period surveyed in all age groups and that for people aged 55 – 64 was generally the highest. Units are measured in percentages.
In 1850, figures of three age groups were given. Only around 2% of people aged 37 – 46 and those aged 47 - 54 lived alone, approximately 1% lower compared to those aged 55 – 64. During the next 50 years, in 1900, the proportion of citizens living alone from 27 – 36 years old contributed just above 2%, while that in 37 – 46 category remained unchanged. There was a slight increase of approximately 1% and 2% in 47 – 54 and 55 – 64 age groups respectively.
A new pattern, people aged 17 – 26, emerged in 1950, with the percentage of those living alone in all ages went up sharply. However, 2000 saw a significant increase in the proportion of citizens living alone. The percentage of those living alone in 37 – 46 age group was followed by those aged 27 – 36, stood at 7% and 8%, respectively, ahead of the 17 – 26 category with just 5%. The figure for 47 – 54 years old group was almost 4 times higher than that in 1950, at 13%; whereas that for 55 – 64 age group nearly doubled to reach the high peak at 17%.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 72
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 89
- In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...ed just above 2%, while that in 37 – 46 category remained unchanged. There was a slight ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
... 8%, respectively, ahead of the 17 – 26 category with just 5%. The figure for 47 – 54 ye...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38697318008 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48561211444 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486590038314 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7800119202 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295038878529 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130843053998 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068775266636 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206768554378 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167252770826 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.