Agree or disagree? It is better to get job that are similar to their parents’ than very different.
People differ greatly in their attitudes towards this problem. Some people hold the opinion that teachers should make their social and political views known to students in the classroom. Others maintain that teachers should not inform the students about their social or political views. However, I agree with the people who think that teachers should tell the students about their opinions of social or political things. I am of this opinion for a couple of reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the students can observe different perspectives. Educational institutions have an important role in students’ lives. Apparently, this is where they start developing their own minds and learn fundamental information. Teachers’ opinions are a part of this, since they are whom students listen to every day. By telling their own perspectives the students will have the opportunity to understand a specific situation from different aspects. My own experience can illustrate my point of view. A month ago my teacher of geography was introducing us a topic, which defined the current state of our country. She mentioned that there are some agricultural issues in my country and the conditions for farming are getting worse. Furthermore, she told her point of view about this problem and she stated that the government must work on this. Otherwise, the people living in rural areas will become unemployed and there will not be any organic food in this country. As a result of this, my teacher's opinion had an influence on me and I realized that sometimes we should try communicating with the government ourselves and tell about a problem if they ignore it.
Secondly, this will be very useful and necessary for the students who are looking forward to becoming a politician. In my country, there are many students who actually like this major and it is their goal to become one. If their teachers tell them about their own opinions it will be an experience for them and they will be prepared for their future. A vivid example that will support my point of view is my brother's experience. My brother really likes getting informed about politics. During his student years he even took a subject associated with politics and her teacher used to tell her own opinion after representing a topic. Consequently, this had really helped him in his life because he is a politician now. Moreover, he became a politician because of the information and knowledge he got during this teacher's classes and lectures.
To recapitulate, I strongly agree that teachers should make their social and political views known to students in the classroom because of the reasons I mentioned above. They are that the students will have the opportunity to observe different perspectives and it will be useful for the ones that are future politicians.
- Agree or disagree? It is better to get job that are similar to their parents’ than very different. 60
- Agree or disagree? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to the students in the classroom. 70
- Agree or disagree? It is better to get job that are similar to their parents’ than very different. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to everyday'?
Suggestion: to everyday
...is, since they are whom students listen to every day. By telling their own perspectives the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 805, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...information and knowledge he got during this teachers classes and lectures. To rec...
^^^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the ones that are future politicians.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06369426752 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81298641433 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473460721868 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3860780966 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7307692308 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1153846154 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0808784160043 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0283911269318 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283018434009 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587630537925 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00963449488836 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.