The graphs illustrate how many units of electricity produced by different types of fuel sources in Australia and France between 1980 and 2000.
In 1980, the dominant fuel source for producing electricity in Australia was coal, with 50 units of electricity produced. The amounts of electricity generated by natural gas and hydro power were equal at 20 units, while oil only contributed 10 units of electricity. In 2000, coal was still the most popular fuel source, and around 75% of overall electricity was produced by coal. Finally, oil and natural gas only provided minimal electricity in 2000.
By contrast, France used less coal and applied nuclear power as a source of electricity. In 1980, natural gas and coal produced the same amount of electricity at 25 units, oil and nuclear power generated 20 units and 15 units of electricity respectively, while hydro power only produced 5 units. In 2000, the popularity of nuclear power grew significantly, with 126 units of electricity generated, which became the main source of electricity in Australia. Meanwhile, the electricity generated by coal and oil remained stable, natural gas and hydro power became less popular in 2000.
Overall, it is apparent that Australia mainly relied on coal to produce electricity, while France relied on nuclear power.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 73
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2619047619 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87600519744 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5202758998 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223920981552 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121773311642 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749768522875 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173206178373 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632971864529 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.