The bar chart provides information about the percentage of Australian people who, in 2010, did physical activity. More specifically, it illustrates male and female's dedication to the sport, by grouping them in six different age groups.
In particular, males who aged 35 to 44, turn out to be the less active among all the age groups, showing a significant decline of 13% compared to women's percentage of 52.5%. However the percentage of men's activism went up to 43,1% for who is aged 45 to 54 and to 45,1% for those who belong to the 55 to 64 age group. The situation changed considerably with the 65 and over age group, where men's percentage, that reached 46,7%, is nearly the same of women's percentage of 47,1%.
The only exception is represented by the 52,8% of male between 15 to 24-year-old boys who are more active than girls of 5,1%.
In conclusion, the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity fluctuated depending on their age, even if it's clear that women tended to exerciseore then men.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...compared to womens percentage of 52.5%. However the percentage of mens activism went up...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87005649718 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82169314152 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661016949153 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6005420861 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395067725186 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172409438852 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086140027651 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212871138434 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950028008747 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.