The table illustrates the how much the residents spent on different types of necessaries in five nations in 2002.
According to the table, food, drinks or tobacco were the most necessary for the consumers among all countries, in terms of the expenditure spent. In particular, the residents of Turkey spent 32.14% of overall expenditure in buying foods/drinks/tobacco, which was the highest among the countries. The proportion spent by Ireland (at 28.91%) was slightly less than that of Turkey, while the remainders spent almost 16%-17% of expenditure to buy foods/drinks/tobacco.
By contrast, leisure/education contributed the least percentage of expenditure, with only less than 5% spent by each of the nations. Turkey spent the most expenditure at 4.35%, while Spain spent the least at 1.98%, and the others spent around 2%-3% of expenditure. Meanwhile, the expenditure spent on clothing/footwear by Ireland, Spain, Sweden and Turkey was alike at 5% to 6%, but the expenditure spent by Italy was significantly higher at 9%.
Overall, it is apparent that the residents in all nations spent the most on the food/drinks/tobacco, while the expenditure on leisure/education was the least.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 89
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
The table illustrates the how much the residents spent on different t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.73797694544 2.65546596893 141% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.0483789868 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0434860753549 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336313543683 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770188851296 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621386942908 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100119144437 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.