The table and bar chart show how journey times in a city center changed after improvements were made to the transport network, and the cost of using different forms of transport in the city. Summarize the information b selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
A glance at the given graphs reveals stark of comparison between form of transport vehicles such as tram, bus, taxi and car and average cost per kilometer with an average journey time before and after improvements were made to the transport network. It was a matter of considerable and interesting to look that taxi was the fastest way (nine minutes) of getting around city before improvements in but slumped after improvements. Whereas, bus was the longest way to reach city in 28 minutes before improvements but boomed to 23 minutes with cheapest cost only 0,4 Euro.
On the other hand, taxi was the fastest and the most expensive vehicle that cost 1,8 Euro for travelling city. For people who find the fastest transportation, they still should find taxi because only take 12 minutes after improvements. Moreover, car was the second rank that cost 1 Euro and wasted 5 minutes longer after improvements, from 10 minutes to 15 minutes. This condition maybe was been influenced by improvements of road that tram used. The graphs indicated that tram was the third rank of transportation that increased dramatically from 22 minutes to only 16 minutes with cost only 0,5 Euro. This leaded to opinion that maybe a half of improvements focused on tram ways so mostly people choose tram to find a cheaper and faster transportation. Similarly, bus boomed from the longest transportation to better one. Before improvements, people needed longer time to reach their main city.
To sum up, improvements were made to the transport network shown the better ways of average time. This condition served a better life to people who find comfortable and affordable transportation with faster time.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-11-22 | avista_nada | 75 | view |
2013-11-21 | affan baskra | 55 | view |
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a variety of social backgrounds mix with each other at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 70
- Some inhabitants think that finding jobs that suitable with interest is happiness. Whereas, others think that happiness is not only influence by good jobs. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give explanation 70
- Going overseas for university study is an exciting prospect for many people. But while it may offer some advantages, it is probably better t stay home because of the difficulties a student inevitably encounter living and studying n a different culture. To 52
- Studying abroad seems like opening greater opportunities for some students over the world. Whereas, some students think differently that living and studying abroad can be difficult. Do you think the positive or negative of advertising? Give some reasons f 70
- Some inhabitants think that divorce is a worst choice if life. Whereas others think opposite. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give explanation 80
Sentence: This condition maybe was been influenced by improvements of road that tram used.
Description: The token was is not usually followed by a verb 'to be', past participle
Suggestion: Refer to was and been
flaws:
No. of Words: 278 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 10
No. of Words: 278 200
No. of Characters: 1376 1000
No. of Different Words: 136 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.083 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.95 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.832 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 96 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.385 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.298 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.403 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.533 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4