Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
The author contends those in power should step down after five years so that others can get an opportunity to take the control in their hands.
In turn this will energize and revive any type of enterprise with the new leadership. In my opinion, every industry should get the exposure to
different idea and approaches but to experience that, one in power should abdicate the position after five years would be wrong. My claim is backed
on myriad premises which are pervasive throughout this essay.
Firstly, anyone who is outstanding is their fields and his company or enterprise is prospering because of his decision making, it will be foolish
of that person to leave his place just because his tenure of five years is over due to many reasons. The company might be at its summit and the person
decides to leave can cause fatal results, the next leader will take some time to get accustomed and meanwhile revenues can go down in terms of business, people
can loose their jobs due to some wrong decisions as the leader is still fledgling. In the field of studies as well if a great professor decides to leave after five
years thinking that the youth should get a chance, there is a possibility that the new person can be good but what if he is not. The students already had a great professor
which they lost . To illustrate my point let us take the example of a multi billion dollar company apple. If Steve Jobs would have thought that my five years are over, and now I will
step down so that a newbie can do my job, the market story of Apple would be different. We know it for sure because we know the ability and the talent Steve Jobs had, hence
it would never be a good idea.
Moreover, I agree with the benefits of rotation of leadership which brings novelty of thoughts, approach and innovations but this rotation should not be
dependent on a time frame. So what I do not agree in the claim presented is the time stamp that has been put for the leader to give up . Morally a person should
resign from his post when he thinks that he is unable to do justice to his work. A perfect example to understand this will be of an Indian cricketer Mahindra Singh Dhoni
who played an awesome series of matches and the India was in its pinnacle under his captaincy but at the age of thirty four he himself felt that its time for the team to have
a new captain and took retirement from cricket with dignity.
However, I also understand, not every human being is honest and somewhere the power and wealth overpowers our conscience, in that case it becomes necessary to put a tenure,
for instance president of most of the democratic country changes after five years, which allows people to choose weather it wants to continue with the same government or needs a change
which is definitely the most viable approach. This approach should be implemented in most of the fields to free people from the misery if there is a bad governance and also
give an option to reelect their leader if he is really worth.
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 66
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 75
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 5, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... down in terms of business, people can loose their jobs due to some wrong decisions ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at professor decides to leave after five years thinking that the youth should get...
^^^
Line 11, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y had a great professor which they lost . To illustrate my point let us take the ...
^^
Line 11, column 121, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had thought'?
Suggestion: had thought
...ion dollar company apple. If Steve Jobs would have thought that my five years are over, and now I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t has been put for the leader to give up . Morally a person should resign from hi...
^^
Line 18, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... felt that its time for the team to have a new captain and took retirement from c...
^^^
Line 21, column 114, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to weather'
Suggestion: to weather
...ve years, which allows people to choose weather it wants to continue with the same gove...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, well, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56146788991 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37832028839 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489908256881 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.4866346867 60.3974514979 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.235294118 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0588235294 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.97078651685 422% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185515029164 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610495839314 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511457916814 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527292005804 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491060656313 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.