The bar chart shows the percentage of people livn alone of five diferent age groups in USA between 1850 and 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of masses who lived alone in five diverse age groups such as: 17-26, 27-36,37-36, 47-54, 55-64 in the USA between 1850 and 2000, a period of 15 decades.
Overall, it can be seen that, the amount of people who was live alone in all the categories in the year of 2000. Whereas, the highest percentage of homosapiens, who living without family is age over 55.
After minute concentration on this chart, it is crystal clear that data of 37-46 age category was stable between 1850 to 1950, but, surprisingly in 2000 it rose drastically and stood at 7 percentum. Moreover, people of 47-54 and 55-64 age category were similar in 1900. However, the age group between 37-46 and 47-54, who lived single at more than 2%.
Probing Further, the majority of people of 55-64 intented to live alone in 2000 which was maximum at more than 16 % as compared to other age groups. Meanwhile, the group of 17-26 begins from after one centuary at aproximate 2 % and after five decades the alone living rate of masses in USA doubled in 2000 stood at 5 percentile.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-25 | Kartik Panjeta | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of people livn alone of five diferent age groups in USA between 1850 and 2000. 78
- The diagram below show how glass containers, such as bottels, are produced and recycled. 78
- The diagram below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. People's reasons for using the car in city. 100
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and receiced in one year 92
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'percentile' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'percentiles'.
Suggestion: percentiles
...asses in USA doubled in 2000 stood at 5 percentile.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69633507853 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53150038273 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0044640824 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323597955926 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140262425634 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647114003309 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203268015799 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603893913067 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.