Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has de- stroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
The issue of whether television has destroyed communication among friends and family is very controversial. One side, supporters of the idea that television is responsible for the lack of communication between friends and family believe that people spend hours watching TV rather than sharing time with their families. One the other hand, critics of this maintain that it is not precisely the television who made that members of family or friends does not communicate each other. They affirm that there are other things, that contribute to this lack of communication. However, after very careful consideration, I maintain the opinion that is television indeed the responsible for the destruction of communication among friends and families
To begin, people do not like having a conversation because they prefer spending great amount of time watching TV. For example, my son is ten years old, he is addicted to watch television all the time. I cannot bother him while he is watching his favorite program because he gets mad. Also, when his friend calls him for facetime he does not want to talk to him because he is concentrated watching YouTube videos. I know television it is not a good influence for him because is destroying our communication.
In addition, television offers varied programs such as novels, movies, and shows that attract most of the public. For example, my best friend Maria loves the novels. She spends most of her time watching them, sometimes I suggest to her that we can share time together instead of wasting her time watching novels. As a consequence, we can strengthen our relationship and our communication.
In conclusion, I agree that television has destroyed the communication among friends and family. The reasons of my beliefs are that people spend much time watching TV because the kinds of programs they offer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-25 | lauren1983 | 73 | view |
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 70
- asteroids are good for three reasons 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- twins studies 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The issue of whether television has dest...
^^
Line 1, column 742, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...communication among friends and families To begin, people do not like having a ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...use is destroying our communication. In addition, television offers varied pr...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... relationship and our communication. In conclusion, I agree that television h...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause the kinds of programs they offer.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19205298013 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94957289519 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519867549669 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6933272755 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.533333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1622242577 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679484787806 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840722975176 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11258785187 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800787094583 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.