The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world
The bar graph illustrates the three major reasons which causing the ground damage in four different venues.
It is clear that africa and asia are two continents which their lands have been destroyed dramatically and also similarly, while australia and europe are considerably lower that stay between 300 and 400 million .
Looking to the reasons behind land loss, we can easily see that in africa,australia and europe,over grazing is the leading cause, which takes down nearly 500,200 and 100 million hectares respectively.Chasing behind breeding is the overcultivation that is responsible for destroying larger areas than farming about 50 million hectares in three areas.
Asia is the region that shows a different picture , where tree-cutting takes over 450 million hectares surface which is 60 million hectares higher than being destroyed by breeding.Last but not least, farming accounts for approximately 430 million hectares ground loss.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-08 | nathalie | view | |
| 2021-12-08 | nathalie | view | |
| 2021-02-11 | fmichela | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
- this flow chart clearly divides the process of getting driving lecense in uS into three main parts and describes the features of each part 87
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. 78
- 1: The information below gives details about household income and spendingon food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 73
- The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village car park now 93
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...er that stay between 300 and 400 million . Looking to the reasons behind land los...
^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , australia
...d loss, we can easily see that in africa,australia and europe,over grazing is the leading ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , over
... see that in africa,australia and europe,over grazing is the leading cause, which tak...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Chasing
...0 and 100 million hectares respectively.Chasing behind breeding is the overcultivation ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... overcultivation that is responsible for destroying larger areas than farming abo...
^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he region that shows a different picture , where tree-cutting takes over 450 milli...
^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Last
...higher than being destroyed by breeding.Last but not least, farming accounts for app...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 12.0 33.7804878049 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6013986014 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12521105114 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3526315398 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 200.25 112.824112599 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.75 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146447289757 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110148933731 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111831283364 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110148933731 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111831283364 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.