Nowadays, no eating meat or fish is a trend that spreads out over the world. It brings a new way to improve the environment and to keep people healthy from poisons that appear inside meat or fish. However, that trend gives challenges in economic and technology.
Meat and fish are the most important food in the meal of each person which provide protein, carbonate, calcium for bodybuilding or energy for activities. Besides, those are popular and convenient to buy. However, in order to have a good commercial product and more valuable, the farmer often feet animal or fish by something which is completely not good for people health, even poison. The chemical substance inside that food will be absorbed into the human body. In addition, during the fabrication process, farmer and food company will clearly affect the environment and then influence seriously human life. For those reasons, some people prefer choosing natural food without meat and fish to protect themselves and improve air, water condition and even sea healthy. It is a really good purpose to reduce such product.
However, to solve this problem, we face many challenges. First, it is necessary to find other food that provides nutrients as meat and fish have. Even we can do it by apply new technology, it leads to roughly increase the price of replacement food. For instance, recently, a Germany company said that they can produce a food-like-beef without using anything from a cow. , But the problem is that the price for each kilogram is much higher than conventional beef, around 10000 times. Hence, it still has a big gap to have such kind of food. Second, meat and fish play an important role in the global economic, from a farm to food process, logistic or supermarket, it requires a contribution of huge workers and then increases economic for each nation.
In my opinion, a better way for people to keep healthy and also protect the environment is to apply technology in food fabrication to get fresh meat and fish. Besides, by replacing the conventional method, waste from that process will be treated better. Moreaver, more law need to band with higher fine money to reduce unfair action in the future.
In conclusion, meat and fish are impossible to replace. We need to improve the conventional way to improve the current situation.
- The widespread use of internet has brought many problems. What do you think are the main problems? What solutions can you suggest? 73
- Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both view and give opinion 89
- Some people believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment and only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 73
- More and more city workers are deciding to live in the country and travel into work every day. The result is increased traffic congestion and damage to the environment. What measures do you think could be taken to encourage people not to travel such long 73
- Topic The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...beef without using anything from a cow. , But the problem is that the price for e...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en increases economic for each nation. In my opinion, a better way for people t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, really, second, so, still, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94615384615 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66503526954 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2376644069 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6818181818 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190264439148 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521775281976 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538381502603 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106399007995 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371675244217 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.