When it comes to choosing a career, people want to choose the one that lead to a secure, successful future, which means the job offers good welfare and wealthy salary. Since the lack of power of individual, fewer choices of careers, unchanged society, it is easier to predict which job is better.
The power of individual is too small to make a different before, so it is hard to success without the help of government or big company. For example, the government would offer stable salary and day off to the employees, and the employees would also get enough money after they retire every month. Whereas, people don't have much resource to start up a business since the advertisement is expensive and not effective enough to appeal crowds of people. Therefore, the best career is to work in the government. However, with the advent of technology, people can simply make a video on the Internet to influence others all over the world. As the individual can change the world through the Internet, they no longer need the help of government to success. On the other hand, the government no long provide relatively high income and even cut the money that can get after they retire. It shows that working in the government is not the best option, and people have to seek other career that can success. Since people nowadays have much more influence, it is hard to guess what the best job would be.
There was not much freedom for people to choose their careers in the past, and only few careers could success under the control of the government. For example, the government would forbid people from opening their own company and becoming a politician to control them. As a result, the only option to success is to study hard to squeeze in the few promising fields. Nowadays, people; however, have lot more career choices due to the change of society. People have the freedom to do any kind of things to do a living, and every road lead to Rome. In the past, drawer can only gain few income and mostly are obscurities, but now they can sell the stickers that they made in communication app by themselves and put their paintings on the Internet to increase their population. Once they are popular on the Internet, they have more opportunities to have cases and become successful. Therefore, the changing is so quickly that it is difficult for people to tell which career would definitely success.
The occupations remain unchanged decades ago. Therefore, it is easy to know which occupation has the most promising future. Nevertheless, the careers change a lot now. For example, people can show their special skills to others or produce videos that depicts their everyday life with their lovely pets. They can do whatever things to earn more money than the career that was thought to make a fortunate in the past. Although there are much more opportunities nowadays, no one can ensure which job must success. The boundary between good occupation and poor occupation is obscure now.
People gain more inferences and have more freedom to choose a job than before, and the changing of careers is beyond our imagination. Therefore, it is more difficult for people to predict which career would success.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hey retire every month. Whereas, people dont have much resource to start up a busine...
^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun income seems to be countable; consider using: 'few incomes'.
Suggestion: few incomes
...Rome. In the past, drawer can only gain few income and mostly are obscurities, but now the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, for example, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2653.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82363636364 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54336342678 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441818181818 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 824.4 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6403319745 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132854320216 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422783902831 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351576303313 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909929136671 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216757385429 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.