The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The supplied maps illustrate an island, which turned into the perfect destination for tourists after the development of tourists facilities.
Overall, it is clear that there is a significant change in the island, nevertheless, the coconut trees keep stay in the same place after the modern construction.
As is presented in the diagrams, Before the facilities were constructed, there was only trees and beach on the island and most of the places were empty. Thereafter, two accommodation zones are constructed on the island, one lies on the west zone and another resides on the middle of the map. All these huts are linked by footpaths. A reception is made between this two zones which is connected by vehicles track with the restaurant and the pier.
It is apparently seen that there is a beach in the northern side of the map which used to swimming for travelers. For sailing on the deep sea there is also a pier in the south-side of the island. It is worth noticing that whole development have been completed without affecting the natural resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the pier. It is apparently seen that there is a beach in the northern side of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, if, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91620111732 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84313087151 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1635516665 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270385660311 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875670569259 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952368509535 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152702458175 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103929377466 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.