The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adults Americans in two of the years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs given illustrate the percentages of married and divorced people in the USA from 1970 to 2000 and the marital status of Americans for 1970 and 2000.
The first chart is consisted of two axes, the vertical one showing the millions and the horizontal one the
four decades of marriages and divorces. As it can be illustrated in all decades the marriages are undoubtedly increased than divorces. More specifically, in 1970 and 2000 divorces reached 1 million. At the same time in 1990 this number changed slightly upwards. On the other hand, marriages hold the first place reaching the number of 2.5 million for the decades 1970 and the next one. As the years pass by, it is evident that married people become less, however not noticeably. The least number of married couples occured in 2000 which were reduced to 3 million couples. The most worth mentioning change concerns the divorces, which in 1980 were risen, touching almost 1.5 million couples.
The graph of marital status delineates the percentage of adults and their marital status. According to the chart, married people hold the highest percentage for both years with a slight increase in 1970. it is worth mentioning that in 1970 people were not acquainted with divorces, whereas this state of mind altered in 2000 by being almost 3 times higher. people who never got married were approximately the same for both years. Nevertheless, widowed adults are below 10 percent in both of the years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-02 | honey_13ielts | 73 | view |
| 2015-04-12 | smrn | 70 | view |
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adults Americans in two of the years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where rel 73
- Some people that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome culture differences.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... status of Americans for 1970 and 2000. The first chart is consisted of two axes...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the millions and the horizontal one the four decades of marriages and divorces. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...four decades of marriages and divorces. As it can be illustrated in all decades th...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ouching almost 1.5 million couples. The graph of marital status delineates the ...
^^^
Line 6, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...h years with a slight increase in 1970. it is worth mentioning that in 1970 people...
^^
Line 6, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...in 2000 by being almost 3 times higher. people who never got married were approximatel...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97154471545 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55335360798 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544715447154 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6785512965 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3571428571 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177388463084 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066842625494 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652961670168 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1246613724 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704005977594 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.