As woman are added to workforce more and more people are prefering the ready to food. This trend has both merits and demerits which are discussed further.
On the one hand, the main advantage is that people can work and can save the time of cooking. As woman are also added to workforce, people don't have much time to cook at home. Due to busy life people cannot cook home and ready to eat food help them to work extra and they can save time of cooking. For example, recent survey of government of India shows that more women are working today and they are less member to cook at home and such food saves their time.
In addition, they can enjoy different varieties of cousins. There are lots of local food restaurants are available and they can enjoy all all new delicacy of foods.
On the other hand, the main disadvantage of precooked food is that they are not believed to be hygienic. As the food is prepared with the same oil multiple times and junk food may lead to health problems. For example, recent survey by a private institute shows that the obesity has been increased due to increase in the deamnd of ready to eat food.
To conclude, from the above discussion, we can say that ready to eat food has more advantages than its disadvantage. Working people gets more time and can focus on their work. People can enjoy home cooking on the festivals with their family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...man are also added to workforce, people dont have much time to cook at home. Due to ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: all
...urants are available and they can enjoy all all new delicacy of foods. On the other ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53784860558 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22666040056 2.80592935109 79% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509960159363 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0309364299 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3571428571 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315565230553 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119427622842 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995332437823 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192545215402 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945215366973 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.