Some people expect that technology will solve the most critical global environmental issues. While technology will undoubtedly play a significant role in addressing these problems, I believe solutions must also involve a broader social movement.
To be sure, environmentally friendly technology has already shown great promise for its ability to tackle global issues. For example, it is now fairly common to see hybrid and fully electric vehicles on the road. The environmental impact of these technologies, at least in my city, has been noticeable. Where I live, air-quality continues to improve. Each year my state reports that we are getting closer and closer to achieving our goal of 100% renewable energy production, all thanks to new clean technologies. These innovations show that, indeed, technical innovation can directly address some of the world’s most pressing environmental problems.
However, in many areas, new technologies are not developing or spreading rapidly enough to resolve critical environmental issues. In these situations, the only immediate solution is for people to work collectively by changing behaviors that damage the environment. For example, consider the alarming amount of plastic particles in the world’s oceans. Some technological solutions to this problem are currently in development. I have read about a large sea “vacuum”and even genetically modified animals that can eat plastic. Yet, these solutions may not solve the ocean-plastic problem before it’s too late for ocean ecosystems. Instead, more cities, businesses, and households will need to take steps to limit everyday plastic use. Some grocery stores no longer use plastic bags, for example. Some families choose to use reusable containers for food instead of single-use plastic ones. Changes like these must be adopted by a very large number of people to have a real impact because technological remedies are not yet available.
In conclusion, while we should continue to seek technological solutions to environmental problems, these innovations cannot sufficiently address them all. People must work together, on a large scale, to address the most serious issues we face as well.
- Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet What are the causes of this problem How could it be solved 67
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project 80
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special, but also very complicated. What are the qualities of a great friend? What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time? 73
In a modern era, the numerous
In a modern era, the numerous challenging predicaments have been alleviated by the unprecedented technological evolutions. Hence, many people deem that it might lead to curb the ever-evolving global environemental concerns such as environmental pollutants, green house gases, rising seal-level and so on. This essay will elucidate the positive influence as well as the certain limitations of modern-technology on the environment.
Undeniably, the modern technological revolutions have already represented the remarkable impacts to circumvent plethora of environmental threats. There have been several pollutant gases, for example, emitted by the modern vehicles such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxides. Fortunately, university research confirmed that these harmful gases could be mitigated by adsorption on the green-catalysts surfaces, consequently, reducing the emission into the environment which might have disastrous consequences such as acid rain, rising sea-levels. Furthermore, there have been latest technology evolving to eliminate green-house gases emission by the giant chemical industries. To illustrate, not only by installing the environmental equipments such as packed bed tower, cyclones, industries but also getting modern state-of-art laboratory tools could actually save our nature.
However, this technolgical equipments have several limitations too. For instance, there have been many unsolved issues still persist such as climate change. To solve this, the famous scientists have been performing the numerous experiments, however, its still puzzled and intricate. In addition to the technology, the government might arrange some environment awarness campaigns such as speeches, poster presentations which undoubtedly enlighten the citizans about the major environemental threats. And due to this, people familirize themselves on the environmental pollutants, eventually, taking the steps to reduce the plastic waste as well as plating the trees.
To recapitulate, due to the fact that technologies have several limitations in terms of years of research, I believe that the public awarness campaignes would certainly help to curb the global nature problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 595, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...chnical innovation can directly address some of the world's most pressing environmenta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s most pressing environmental problems. However, in many areas, new technologies...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68373493976 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21278535951 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635542168675 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0214039012 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.35 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155338818417 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502561147957 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519255223688 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109740369754 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390457902982 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.