the graph describes the number of people using the Internet from 1998 to 2004
A flick through the users connecting to the Internet percentage reflects the discrepancy among four types of locations between 1998 and 2004.
As can be clearly seen, the percentage of people using the Internet at home and in the library remained relatively constant, while the figure for access to work and college decreased.
More specifically, in 1998 the proportion of users accessing the Internet from home was the highest at around 54 per cent. By contrast, the rate for those who used it in the library was the lowest point of exactly ten per cent. Approximately 30 per cent of people connected to the Internet at work compared to precisely 20 per cent at college.
The percentage of Internet users gaining access from their houses rose slightly by approximately one per cent in 2004, after a gradual decline of about just above five per cent in 2000.on the other hand, the figure for access to work and college decreased minimally to ten per cent and roughly 20 per cent respectively. People accessing the Internet at the library increased five per cent from 1998 to 2000 and then dipped marginally by two per cent where it remained throughout 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- In order for a child to develop his/ her family life mothers and fathers should take a course on parenting skills and child development each year. 56
- the graph describes the number of people using the Internet from 1998 to 2004 67
- In order for a child to develop his/ her family life mothers and fathers should take a course on parenting skills and child development each year. 56
- Research indicates that the characteristic we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any other experiences we may have in our 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87373737374 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66997900344 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3269451137 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197009058676 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116887582778 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513418941957 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137287913904 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00896627409414 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.