The pie charts demonstrate the volume of energy generated from six various resources in a specific nation over the course of a two separate year.
The pie charts demonstrate the volume of energy generated from six various resources in a specific nation over the course of a two separate year.
Overall, as can be seen, far more nuclear and hydro energy had been produced by 2003, compared with 1985. Besides, the amount of oil and coal shrank significantly, while the proportion of gas produced remained constant.
Looking at the pie charts, it is crystal clear that in 1985 the volume of oil produced accounts for roughly half of the all energies with 52%, followed by coal and nuclear energy constituting 22% and 13% respectively.
Regarding the graph in 2003, oil and coal experienced a noticeable decrease reaching 39% and 8% respectively. Conversely, nuclear, hydro and renewable energies proportion soared making 23%, 22%, and 4% respectively in the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-10 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 22 | view |
- It is true that disabled people encounter various difficulties in their lives in all corner of the world. 78
- The bar chart compares various modes of daily commute including train, car, tube, and bus in three different time spans. 84
- The charts compare the volume of water utilized for the industry, agriculture, and houses in six various locations around the globe. 78
- It is true to say that in some nations many people struggling with a wide range of diseases due to consuming excessive junk food. 73
- The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in five various countries. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, if, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 694.0 1615.20841683 43% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 134.0 315.596192385 42% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17910447761 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 4.20363070211 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89890554777 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 176.041082164 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.671641791045 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 506.74238477 40% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6896483428 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34313565982 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194934669509 0.084324248473 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.361662610073 0.0667982634062 541% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287842426859 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.41240971704 0.056905535591 725% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.