The bar graph depicts the people visiting the Grandville Stadium during different events. It is based on actual figures and projected values after a major renovation.
Overall, it is evident that the improvement initiative is expected to be a major success. This will result in more crowds flocking to this stadium. Moreover, the population is largely dependent on the nature of event that is, whether it is theater, sporting events or concerts.
More popular events like sports tournaments and matches seem to attract most people. Hence, the impact of renovation is only mildly visible in such situations. Currently, the count of attendees is almost one lakh fifty thousand for such events. But, this is only going to marginally increase by 2030.
However, in case of concerts it is expected that the audience will grow by around 150 percent. This is demonstrated by the projected figures towering above one lakh. This is in contrast with present attendance being well under fifty thousand.
The attendees for theater related events was only a trifling number in 2017. Yet, the upcoming decade is expected to witness a surge in the same. The rough estimate is around fifty thousand.
On a concluding note, it is clear that the best improvement is felt in those events which are not having mass appeal.
- the table shows how many people used different form public transport in million between 2010 and 2014. 56
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011. 61
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects, while others claim that students should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find interesting. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 84
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, well, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10185185185 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62641626828 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615740740741 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.8232892455 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.875 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188872240268 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535947766843 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650324501626 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907972199789 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652539857187 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.