TPO16Q1
The article discusses fascinating topic pertaining to limitation and serious problem that the science of archaeology was faced and provides three reasons of support for that, however, the professor explains that these claims are not true according to the guideline that organized for improvement supporting archaeologists in 1990 and opposes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading passage discusses that one of the main reason for the loss of the valuable artifact is that because they use for construction projects. In contrast, the professor provides information that base on the new guideline, no one allows to manipulate of the artifact for building. This guideline just permitted to archaeologist and government to decide about artifacts that are discovered in the archaeological area. In fact, these organizations are responsible for building and excavating. Clearly, the disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor.
Second, the article pushes forth the idea that many archaeologists complain about the amount of budget that dedicated to archaeological research and they believe it is not adequate. However, the classroom discussion contends that financial support with this field is reasonable. According to the professor, the construction company paid this budget. This company support every sits that have a contract with them and the government has not any role in payments. He states the according to the guideline, the financial support increase rather than the past. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in reading unsubstantiated.
Finally, the reading posits that finding job in archaeology field is hard. The professor refutes this point by explaining that new guideline introduces many careers relate to archaeology. He says students who want educate in archaeology science would be hired in a job that related to research, preservation, and process data. The opportunity for finding job is easy for professional people and they have never experienced unemployment.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 14 Q1 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 15 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 48
- TPO 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'manipulating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: manipulating
...ase on the new guideline, no one allows to manipulate of the artifact for building. This gui...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have never experienced unemployment.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63344051447 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15767414532 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.135626403 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262144323862 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776030115422 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045658311977 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15732915591 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189422563292 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.