The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The charts show the amount of water used globally in 3 different sectors from 1900 to 2000 and water consumed in 2 countries in 2000. Overall, it is obviously apparent that at the beginning of period, Agriculture used most water. Then, at the end of period, each of them had an upward trend. In other side, Brazil utilized more water that that of Congo.
Regarding the first chart, in 1990, Agriculture had the highest figure, accounting for around 700 km2 while industrial use and domestic use were at only about 150 km2 and 100 km2 respectively. Over a century, they saw a similar increase where Agriculture rose to 3000 km2 and become the highest. Likewise, industrial use, which remained unchange in the mid-century, inclined to just above 1000 km2 in 2000. However, even though domestic use stayed constant in the half of period, it slowly went up at the end.
Turning to the second chart, the number of people living in Brazil (176 million) was higher than that in Congo (5.2 million). Then, the irrigated field needed by Brazil reached 26,500 km2, compared to only 100 km2 in Congo. Lastly, there was exponentially significant gap of water consumption between Brazilian and Congonese (359 m3 and 8 m3 per person consecutively).
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 78
- The diagram shows the skeletal systems of two ancestors of modern human beings 86
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 78
- The graphs below depict information about the Expenditure on Health and Education in the UAE (% of GDP) between 1985 and 1993, and also Infant Mortality and Life Expectancy from 1970 to 1992. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... other side, Brazil utilized more water that that of Congo. Regarding the first chart,...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, likewise, regarding, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66173438419 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647619047619 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3151104316 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163732387979 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629424349432 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659785994406 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111493812916 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730145454527 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.