Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Business, politics, education and government are the four crucial factors to evaluate the progress of a country. Without proper leadership and management in these sectors, a nation cannot be developed. I strongly agree with the statement that the tenure in these areas should be for five years for a particular leader or a group.
Firstly, it is important to keep moving with the fast growing society and revolutionary inventions of science. We can see different innovations and novel ideas being flourished now and then and a leader should be aware of the latest discoveries of these tools and techniques to implement those in his field. Moreover, power must not be accumulated only by some people, it should be earned through proper examination and after gathering enough knowledge about the phenomena which are significant to lead in the various arenas. Furthermore, the suitable candidate must be given the priority over the hierarchy of power. For example, if Steve Jobs, the founder of renowned company Apple, thought that only he and his offsprings will lead the company then this company would have been vanquished by any other companies like Samsung, Nokia and so on.
Secondly, If power in one particular person or a team is being prolonged than five years, then reluctance or haughty mentality may arise in the mind of a leader or a leading group in corporates, education and government as well. The existing leaders might feel that nothing can stop them to do whatever they want. By this parochial thinking they will easily eschew from their duties and obligations towards the organizations or the society . The consequence of this type of mentality will badly impact the institutions of which they are in charge of. But if they know that they are to lead for five years then they will not be able to think in a negative way.For this reason, five years duration in leadership role is expected.
However, some might refute the statements by stating that, experience is a more crucial factor than subject or theoretical knowledge. Some People might also think that if the leaders know that their obligations are for only five years then they will do their duties in a slapdash way which will create serious issues for these organizations. After that, it can be posited by some people that, in five years interval the institutions will encounter the various type of changes in the management side which will hamper the very uniqueness of these areas.
In a nutshell, according to the Chinese philosophy light and shadow, it can be mentioned that nothing in this world has only positive sides or only negative sides. Hence, it is our duty to adopt the positive aspects of a thing just the negate the negative effects. In this scenario, a five-year period leadership has more positive sides than the negative ones and thus, I strongly believe that this method should be implemented in every sphere of life.
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 69
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 83
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and techniques to implement those in his field. Moreover, power must not be accum...
^^
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...towards the organizations or the society . The consequence of this type of mentali...
^^
Line 4, column 642, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ars then they will not be able to think in a negative way.For this reason, five years duration in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 660, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... not be able to think in a negative way.For this reason, five years duration in lea...
^^^
Line 6, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...experience is a more crucial factor than subject or theoretical knowledge. Some P...
^^
Line 6, column 268, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a slapdash way" with adverb for "slapdash"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ve years then they will do their duties in a slapdash way which will create serious issues for th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 233, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...pt the positive aspects of a thing just the negate the negative effects. In this scenario,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97750511247 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68714371736 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507157464213 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2518311845 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.105263158 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7368421053 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63157894737 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136078749583 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415927851281 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350251780757 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787963889533 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310322080446 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.