Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement asserts that when a work in any field is judged critically the critic has value just in the case that it is an expert's opinion. While some people may agree with the statement and other may disagree, in this debate I am in the group of those who believe the statement is mostly true. That's because, most of the time experts are those who have done that work many times and are completely dominant on the subject. Therefore, they can observe hidden aspects of the issue. Moreover, when ordinary people criticize a project their opinion is mostly coming from their limited experiences. Thus, their comments are most of the time flawed. Another important point to be considered on this subject is that experts have different levels and we shouldn't expect all of them same level of quality in criticizing. I will elaborate my ideas in the upcoming paragraphs.
First, when a project is showcased it is easy for everyone to have a comment on it. Nevertheless, there is a huge different between someone who had never seen a similar project and a person who is an expert and have done that project many times by his own hands. This means, an expert has enough experience to understand different aspect of the project. Thus, he has a comprehensive vision about the showcased work and he will not view it from just one side. For instance, when a movie wins a great prize like Oscar we can see that in some cases ordinary people does not like the movie, or they do not understand main concepts of the film. However, judges vote to that movie due to its special qualities which ordinary people cannot distinguish them. That’s while, when an expert talks about different aspects of that movie, it helps people to understand values or flaws of the movie better and they may change their idea after listening to that critic. The above is an example to show that ordinary people are not able to distinguish hidden aspects of a project. Thus, they may make negative comments about a work. However, when an expert reveals those aspects their vision is broaden and it may lead in a change in their idea. Thus, an experts comment is really different from ordinary people's ideas.
Some people may argue that being an expert is not equal of being a good criticizer. That's because someone can be an expert by experiences. However, being a criticizer is another expertise which needs specialized education. For instance, someone may be a good painter by working for long years. Thus, everyone will know him as an expert in painting. However, he may not be able to criticize works of other painters. That's because, he doesn't know about history of art and painting. Moreover, he is not familiar with different theories and specialized jargon of painting. Thus, he cannot make an expertized critic. I totally agree with this Idea. However, I believe although this painter's critic is less proper than an educated painter, his comments are more credited than a person who had never touched a painting brush. That is to say, it is not just black and white. We should see a spectrum which goes from white to black. Thus, it has many gray parts. Some parts are dark gray and others are lighter tones. This means we shouldn't polarize critics to educated experts and ordinary people. There may be differences in their qualities. But, their comments are mostly more validated than ordinary people's ideas.
To sum it up, expert's critics are more valuable than ordinary people's comments whether they are educated or they are experts by experiences. However, credit of that critic is depended on quality and level of the experts. This means we shouldn't expect all expert same level of criticism. Therefore, Critical judgment of works has little credit, unless it is made by an expert.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | tg763622253 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | ghazalsaed1995 | 16 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Dipu2012 | 33 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 70
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 26
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia."Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, f 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...as value just in the case that it is an experts opinion. While some people may agree wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...o believe the statement is mostly true. Thats because, most of the time experts are t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 750, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...at experts have different levels and we shouldnt expect all of them same level of qualit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'broadened'.
Suggestion: broadened
...t reveals those aspects their vision is broaden and it may lead in a change in their id...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...s not equal of being a good criticizer. Thats because someone can be an expert by exp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs specialized" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'specializing' or 'to be specialized'.
Suggestion: specializing; to be specialized
...icizer is another expertise which needs specialized education. For instance, someone may be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e to criticize works of other painters. Thats because, he doesnt know about history o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ks of other painters. Thats because, he doesnt know about history of art and painting....
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'painters'' or 'painter's'?
Suggestion: painters'; painter's
... Idea. However, I believe although this painters critic is less proper than an educated ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1024, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...others are lighter tones. This means we shouldnt polarize critics to educated experts an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...and level of the experts. This means we shouldnt expect all expert same level of critici...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in some cases, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 69.0 33.0505617978 209% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3127.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 650.0 442.535393258 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81076923077 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04926703274 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4949563324 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410769230769 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 982.8 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 6.24550561798 336% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 41.0 20.2370786517 203% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8827807686 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2682926829 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8536585366 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.24390243902 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210262265461 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551278403332 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550592943333 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145344476024 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185982265079 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.