The best way to educate children is by using the internet in every lesson to what extent do you shere this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessuar effective for children
It is believed that over the past few decades the word has saw the rapid strides in technology, especially in the field of education, as it has been seen that use of internet has expanded among the schools in many countries, I personally agree with this statement to some extent, and I will explain why in this essay.
On the one hand, it is true that today it is highly imperative for pupils that know about the new technology in this competitive epoch. So, to allow the internet in school a play a key role in the development of a student. By knowing the advantages of the internet, the students can comprehend any concept of study which is not understood by them in classrooms. In addition, data is easily available on the not with a single search of the keyword. This benefit lures most to the students to prefer studying on the internet instead of the conventional books. A good illustration for this would be google search engine which is the most used tool for obtaining the data. They become used to getting information quickly.
On the other hand. Though,in spite of the internet being such helpful in school. Its drawbacks can not be overlooked. It is likely that the pupils can be overdependence on the internet. It can swallow the direct interaction between students and teacher. For instance, there are many websites on the internet which students can attend any lecture of his class through the internet while sitting at home. So, they probably make it a habit and they can give preference to the online methods of study, there is surety that every student would use this technology in a positive way.
Overall, to be concluded that it is in the hand of the school departments to make the positive development of use of internet in school, they should allow the students to use the internet to such an extent that it can not impact the practical knowledge and interaction of the students with teacher
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-21 | Nurma elia oktaviana | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
... over the past few decades the word has saw the rapid strides in technology, especi...
^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ormation quickly. On the other hand. Though,in spite of the internet being such hel...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...on quickly. On the other hand. Though,in spite of the internet being such helpfu...
^^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...every student would use this technology in a positive way. Overall, to be concluded that it is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, for instance, in addition, in spite of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70919881306 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68421860911 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504451038576 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.4226910505 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163422678777 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532652384704 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381639639271 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104700509817 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135527463768 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.