Job fields

Essay topics:

Job fields

These pie charts below illustrates that the percentage of Tanzanian and Irish worked in different fields which include agriculture, services, manufacturing, construction and energy and water in 1999.

It can be seen that majority of people in Tanzania worked agriculturally (79%). However most of Irish acted in services by 71.1 percent. The second functional aspect in which Tanzanian employees performed, was services that include tourism (14.2%) though next placement for Irish people was manufacturing by 21.5%. The percentage of third popular working major was manufacturing in Tanzania which had 6.2 people in 100 ones. Construction had 4.1 percent of Irish workers.

According to the charts, in Tanzania, construction by 0.6% was in the last place of popularity eventhough in Irland, agricultural and foresty jobs then energy and water field were the least job empolyments with respectively about 2 and 1.3 percent.

Overall, the way of dividing the eployees in both Tanzania and Irland were the same but there were clear distinctions between the range of people who worked.

Votes
Average: 7 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-10-07 1u2i3o4 11 view
2018-10-07 1u2i3o4 11 view
2018-10-07 uio 11 view
2018-10-07 1u2i3o4 11 view
Essay Categories

Comments

These pie charts below illustrates that the percentage of Tanzanian and Irish worked in different fields which include...
These pie charts below illustrate that the percentage of Tanzanian and Irish working in different fields which include...

Sentence: According to the charts, in Tanzania, construction by 0.6 was in the last place of popularity eventhough in Irland, agricultural and foresty jobs then energy and water field were the least job empolyments with respectively about 2 and 1.3 percent.
Error: empolyments Suggestion: employments
Error: foresty Suggestion: forest
Error: eventhough Suggestion: No alternate word

Sentence: Overall, the way of dividing the eployees in both Tanzania and Irland were the same but there were clear distinctions between the range of people who worked.
Error: eployees Suggestion: employees

flaws:
Still have grammatical issues. Read a good grammar book.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 168 200
No. of Characters: 887 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.6 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.28 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.956 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 65 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 48 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.32 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.433 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.694 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.083 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4