Education is one of the most crucial components of human life. Some people may claim that in order to improve the quality of education, professors should be paid well. I, however, partially agree with this and provide another reason what I think about this issue.
To begin with, humanity has developed and improved with the knowledge of ancient scholars who learned everything and enhanced their knowledge with a good education. It is a known fact that philosophers did not have any concern thus, were free to think of everything. This exactly helped them to make wonderful contributions to humanity. If we consider universities as the place where science proceeds and, professors as those who make great contributions to humanity like ancient scholars, universities or governments should meet their demands and reduce their concerns. The best way of doing this would be to pay them more money. For instance, several years ago, some professors in Jamaica made protest because of low salaries. They claimed that they could not concentrate on their job because they had to work at a second job in order to meet their demands. Then the government helped universities to increase salaries. As a result, the professors could provide students with a better education.
Unfortunately, paying weel salary is not enough to improve the quality of education at universities. More facilities are necessary to enhance it. For instance, universities should have qualified facilities such as rich libraries, well-designed classes and advanced equipment to offer students a better academic environment. Moreover, better education not only means a better academic environment and qualified professors but also means better social facilities such as movie clubs or cafeterias. I believe that social activities as important as academic facilities in terms of triggering the students' desire of studying and providing qualified education.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that spending money on professors might be an effective way of improving the quality of the universities but not enough. Universities also spend money on social and academic facilities inside the campus.
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific re 70
- Eco certification and American wood companies (Integrated)Reading Section: In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological stan 97
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, thus, well, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38123167155 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99225155539 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551319648094 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.037769668 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5789473684 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210058193724 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619934396248 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558281541318 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137519327547 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508985715846 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.