Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their
employees to the countryside.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
A solution to traffic and accommodation can be shifting of large companies, factories and their workers to the countryside,
In my opinion, this is not the best solution to the problem in the wake of effective solution present.
To begin with, movement of factories and substantial population will destroy the essence of the countryside. Needless
to say, migration of this huge scale would affect the natural beauty of the countryside. Moreover, agricultural land
will be compromised in order to accommodate this movement, hence production of crops will suffer. Furthermore, it is
an enormous task to provide all the facilities for companies and factories to operate. For instance, power supply to
countryside is limited because of less demand and transmission lines are laid according to the demands. In case of movement
of factories and companies, laying of new transmission line will be required which is quite expensive. Therefore,
it is not a wise decision to shift the industries to countryside.
However, traffic congestion and accommodation issues are a matter of grave concern but there are solutions to it.
For example, to ease the traffic congestion in the city, a study and the implementation of transportation management
can be effective. It can include the construction of more bridges, flyovers or underpasses, as well as development of
different modes of transportation. Similarly, housing issues can be solved by construction of multi storey buidlings,
in case of scarcity of land in urban cities. For example, Japan is continuously working on projects which increases
the capacity of accommodation vertically because of less available land.
In conclusion, there are several better ways to solve the housing and traffic issues rather than shifting of factories
and their workers to countryside which will generate more complicated issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | ranakandar | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | Gohar Khan | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | Gohar Khan | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that instead of having to prepare for huge numbers of exams in school, children should learn more. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Use your own experience to support your ideas. 75
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think the traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- In most parts of the world people are living longer. What are the possible causes of this situation? Is this a negative or positive development? 78
- Some people indicate that certain kind of music can promote learning for young children, while many researches showed that results are mixed. What is your opinion? Use your own experience and observation. 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countryside. Moreover, agricultural land will be compromised in order to accommod...
^^^
Line 19, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usly working on projects which increases the capacity of accommodation vertically...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57785467128 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27937879171 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1821907117 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.38176352705 388% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194984421502 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617122527038 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478262836176 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580978585624 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490408495874 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.