Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Rich countries often help developing countries by sending them money to change their situation. However, money cannot solve poverty entirely. I totally agree that money is not a good way to help but developed countries can help third-world countries with improving education, infrastructure and medical health.
Money cannot help third-world countries deal with poverty entirely because money pay for temporary cases, not permanent. First, they may not have enough technology to building houses, roads, and schools with high quality and lower cost. Therefore, their infrastructure might be easy to break and hardly to escape poverty. Second, corruption in third-world countries is an on-going concerned for donors. Funds donated to governments in developing countries are often siphoned off by officials. As the result, the situation of developing countries is never improved.
Developed countries should help poorer countries by improving their education, building infrastructure, and supplying medical. It is no doubt that education will help developing countries have a well-educated population. This labor resources will devote their youth to contributing to the developing of their countries. In addition, by helping developing countries in infrastructure, the trade between urban and suburban, cities and rural will be improved. Furthermore, medical health is a great support to the third countries. It is obvious that people cannot work effectively with an unhealthy body. Hence, developed countries should invest their money in the aspects above to solve the problems of developing countries.
To sum up, money is a great support to developing countries but it cannot help to solve poverty in a long-term. Therefore, money have to use the right way to help third-world countries find the way to enhance the living standards, helping people in these countries have a better life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
Rich countries often help developing countries by sending them money to chan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...rruption in third-world countries is an on-going concerned for donors. Funds donated to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...It is no doubt that education will help developing countries have a well-educated populati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...heir countries. In addition, by helping developing countries in infrastructure, the trade ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
... but it cannot help to solve poverty in a long-term. Therefore, money have to use the right...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, well, in addition, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6350877193 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04814350454 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4022270992 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36129604991 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13449432616 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902819374351 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260487546957 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478223387156 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.