As the American proverb says: “Age is just a number”, I consider forcing people to quit their jobs based on a benchmark of their age is a matter which is against their human rights. Since achieving at work, being qualified and up to the required tasks is a matter of mental and physical healthiness, so why issuing a decision of retirement on an experienced employee in case he or she is able to give and be useful to the enterprise in which he’s hired and knows each and every corner in it?
Though it’s good to keep people working and give them the choice to continue even after reaching the age of 60 or 65, but still they have be evaluated. Normally, most human beings – especially professional employees – would NOT feel comfortable realizing they have come to an end and they’re being put aside. So, if they’re found out to be unable to proceed, there must be a way to convince them that they are thanked for the time and effort, and they have to enjoy the rest of their life doing something else like enjoying travelling, spending time with their families, or busying themselves in another social activity. Mainly this needs qualified social agents, maybe hired by the government itself, which can have sessions with these old category to pass the idea to them that they are still useful but in another way and in a different field of life.
The equation of sending old employees who have reached the age of over 60 and giving a chance to young generation is something that needs to work on socially and governmentally through mixing the two calibers to prepare the young generation on one hand to be up to the tasks, processes and polices, and to get the benefit of the older employees’ experiences and make them feel useful on the other hand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...he age of 60 or 65, but still they have be evaluated. Normally, most human beings ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70476190476 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70015629942 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 20.2975951904 222% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.8378738025 49.4020404114 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 211.714285714 106.682146367 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.0 20.7667163134 217% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228234461145 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113013036647 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676349995342 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13920555762 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586142164962 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.2 13.0946893788 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.87 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.1190380762 198% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.