Which technology, in your opinion, has had the greatest impact on your lives? Why? Use examples and reasons to support your argument.
1) Smartphone
2) Television
3) Cars
From my perspective, smartphones have had the greatest influence on lives among the other technology like cars and television: especially young children that for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the cost of the phones has had the greatest impact on our lives. Mobil phones are less expensive and everybody can afford one. For example my friend Alex, when he was studying high school, he brought brand new I phone with his pocket money. This example clearly illustrates that million can afford and communicate well; as a result, the world is small.
In addition, Phones had the greatest impact on lives because they combine music, TV, movies, and podcast which makes people too addicted to it. For instance, My Friend Ram recently buys a new android phone. Initially, he used it to communicate with his friends and families via video calling, facebooks, and other social media. But later, he started to play online games and watching videos. What more, now he was completely addicted to his phone and using his phone even in the class rather focusing on the lecture. So, there is no doubt that a smartphone has the greatest impact on people.
When all is said and done, I contended that smartphones had the greatest impact on people compared to other advanced technology. It is cheap and everyone can afford it to buy the smartphone and it makes people to an addict because it can be used for multiple purposes. So, I suggest parents to closely monitor their children while using smartphones to limit the usage of the phone.
- Imagine you if a professor or a lecture given you the wrong information to the audience, when did you ask the question?During the meeting or after the meeting. 43
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- the argument on the online edition of the encyclopedia. the reading claims that online edition has several drawbacks over traditional books. 81
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- the argument on the accuracy of Chevalier de Seingalt memoir. summarize the points made on the lecture and the reading and how the professor refutes the reading claims. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hones to limit the usage of the phone.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 268.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86194029851 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52062940988 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1230731203 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138871966438 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511125998937 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475792033333 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907023619682 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149918757871 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.