TOEFL integrated writing: work a four-day week.
The article states that working four-days week is quite beneficial for the company and individuals and provides three compelling reasons for support. however, the professor explains that it has a couple of drawbacks for both and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading points out that working a few hours is to enhance the company's main profit because of employees less tired and more energetic that they may more hard-working on their job. The company’s expectation from their staff is very high and they believed that they can accomplish the same amount of work as before they did. however, the professor refutes this point by saying that adding more staff is required more training courses and medical insurance. Besides, the lecturer states that it is also needed more office space and computers are very harmful to the economy of the company.
Second, the article posits that it decreases the unemployment percentage of the USA due to the engaging of the part-time working crew replacing vacancy full-time workers. Some companies can’t afford to pay those two kinds of worker’s wages, so they decided to persuade to work more time. it makes all workers more unpleasant with their job.
Third, the reading posits that their workers can spend more time with their family and pursuing their hobby on account of the fact that they have plenty of time to concern their private lives but professor opposes this point by explaining that having a lot of time to do something beyond their job is precarious. Since they may lose their job abilities and even further if someone wants to pursue a career it is not possible for them to achieve their goal, even more, they aren’t allowed to think about the promoting quickly because of this policy.
- Why do you think people attend college or university? 85
- Many people welcome the opening of shopping areas near their homes. On the other hand, some people are strongly opposed to the construction of such facilities. If the opening of a large shopping centre in your neighbourhood were announced, would you suppo 3
- The reading states that dinosaurs were endotherms and author provides reasons threef support. However, the professor explains that dinosaurs were not actually an endothers animal and refutes each of the author's reasons.First of all, the articles cl 80
- integrated essay TPO13 90
- Many people welcome the opening of shopping areas near their homes. On the other hand, some people are strongly opposed to the construction of such facilities. If the opening of a large shopping centre in your neighbourhood were announced, would you suppo 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s three compelling reasons for support. however, the professor explains that it has a c...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...same amount of work as before they did. however, the professor refutes this point by sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... decided to persuade to work more time. it makes all workers more unpleasant with ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01006711409 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5162795926 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9068965152 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.727272727 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840528947661 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385586585922 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624897509315 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668951724828 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579052533059 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.