The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; CHina and India. Write a report to describe this data
The pie charts give information about the average food of different types being consumed in the world in comparison with that in two nations being China and India.
Generally, people all over the world filled their stomach mainly with processed food. In addition, Chinese and Indian people ate nuts and seeds by far more than residents in the rest of the world did.
Regarding processed food and vegetables, just over 40% diet of global population came from processed food in 2008, which was slightly greater than that of India and exactly 7% higher than that of China. Vegetables and fruits provided one-third dietary requirements of the Chinese citizens and precisely 23% of Indians. The world average for fruit and vegetable consumption was just below 30%.
Interestingly, nuts and seeds accounted for almost one-fifth food stocks for the Chinese, a noticeably higher rate than the world standard and 8% higher than the figure for the Indian. Food deprived from animals supplied more than a quarter of Indian dietary provisions, which was 12% higher than that of China and almost the same of the world’s food demands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-21 | rika_lavarose | 78 | view |
- Some groups of people have benefit from modern communication technology but some people have not benefit at all to what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- The maps below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present. 78
- The line paragraphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010. 84
- The maps below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present. 67
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14594594595 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54694993689 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6095864375 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208096873634 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095259901062 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754540982112 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139980548232 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751190170152 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.