It is often argued that Some people who were in prison and have become good citizens now are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There might be controversial debates regarding the issue of whether it is allowable for students to be taught by citizens who used to be criminals or not. The opponent might agree with the topic. However, I strongly believe that people who committed crimes in the past cannot be in the position of teaching students. In this regards, I will write this concerning my opinions.
Firstly, those people cannot meet the criteria to educate students. In general, young students are still immature and vulnerable, and their personality has not been shaped fully yet, so this is the point why they should get the proper education. From this view, people who teach students should meet moral or ethical standards since they can have huge influences on students. However, regardless of whether they are ordinary citizens or not, they used to be criminals in the past, and that fact can verify that those people have failed to meet standards be in the position of teaching students. Thus, they cannot teach students.
Furthermore, the nature of criminals tends not to alter easily. As a lot of researches indicate, there are many criminals who recommit similar crimes again, and it has proven that criminals are not educated easily. Thus, if people who used to be criminals take the position of teaching students, they can aim to young students as the target of crimes. Moreover, if young students are taught vivid and detailed experiences about committing crimes, rather than they are aware of the perils of crimes, they can copycat crimes, and it can result in serious consequences.
In conclusion, although being taught the danger of crimes by people who committed crimes could have a few advantages, I firmly argue that negative aspects caused by it outweigh positive aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n the position of teaching students. In this regards, I will write this concerning m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, thus, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07849829352 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61964457734 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508532423208 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5562211913 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157314068888 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616305958599 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605360521084 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121493412627 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569562507317 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.