Several folks start buying ready made fast food because restaurant more attractive offer to predict this reason to human less priority given on cooking. In this essay I will discuss side view prons and cons.
In one hand side, the technology fast growing to make fast delicious item compered to human. People have save time to spend other activities to do complete the task or work. The lot of geust are coming home than have no enough time to make cook it that time buying fast food and variatie of chooses item food to purchase to eat share food each other. This day woman and men both are getting the job than after human was under stress of work so less time buying food item eat. Sometimes delay by work you have not enough time spend cooking activities, so you can afford to online order within 10 to 20 minutes your order in doors.
On the other side, restaurant or cafe given lot of facility on online mode or call value than this reason to obesity level soar. The scientist prove that human buying ready made food eat in outside effect on abdomen and ailments. Human get lazy for cooked. Sometimes outside food is expired than people eat to effect on immunity system.
I pen down saying that, human more attractive on outside food item buying to eating, but other side sereval impact on body.
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000. 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet but there is not enough political action to control excessive consumerism and pollution Do you agree 72
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'proves'.
Suggestion: proves
...on to obesity level soar. The scientist prove that human buying ready made food eat i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 235.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57872340426 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03016634133 2.80592935109 72% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578723404255 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8770521885 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 7.06120827912 8% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248457447914 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090024206187 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654516350848 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15535616267 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199914626039 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.