The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the average distance travelled by English people per year and how much the changes in mode of transportation in England between 1985 and 2000.
Generally, it can be seen from the table that the average of distance travelled by English people in various modes of transportation increased significantly from 4,740 miles in 1985 to 6,475 miles in 2000.
In 1985, the highest average of distance was at 3,199 miles by car, followed by other transportation at 450 miles. Then, local bus had the average at 429 miles; it was quite high for people to use this mode of transportation. Moreover, walking and train had the same average, the difference just by 34 miles. Next, long distance bus had a small average of distance at 54 miles.
Over fifteen years, English people have changed in use mode of transportation. The changing of average distance by car went up higher to 4,806 miles, followed by other transportation climbed to 585 miles. Then, local bus declined sharply by 155 to 274 miles. Next, walking had the average at 255 miles in 1985 and it dropped by 18 to 237 miles in 2000. Conversely by train, the average of distance increased considerably from 289 miles to 366 miles. Next, long distance bus rose up rapidly by 70 to 124 miles.
Interestingly, there were few English people who use taxi and bicycle as their transportation so the average distance from both of them was just approximately 50 miles from 1985 to 2000.
Overall, it can be concluded that at the beginning many of English people used several of transportation to travel around city or just went to the near location but over fifteen years they used transportation to travel the long destination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Pgreat | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | ralfs | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | alona2501 | view | |
| 2019-03-27 | Sadia Akram | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sadia Akram | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods inBritain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topicShould wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsi 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
... it dropped by 18 to 237 miles in 2000. Conversely by train, the average of distance incre...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 3.97073170732 529% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88659793814 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89646489063 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463917525773 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1050854401 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100048019445 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446683911868 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607869792624 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082403084405 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729492240029 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.