The table compares the proportion of six internet activities done by seven age groups. As is observed, there are noticeable differences in what internet uses of different ages do online.
Getting news is a popular activity among all ages, with each group contributing no less than 70% proportion. In contrast, figures for games decline steadily with the increase of age, the ratio starting from 80% teens and ending at a quarter of 50 and 60-year-olds, with a slight rise among age 70 group. Downloads displays a similar trends with less popularity, from 52% teens to 6% 70-year-olds.
Although the majority of all age groups do product research online, teens' activity do not involve it at all. They also seldom search for people but more than one fifth do it when growing older. Conversely, buying products account for a slight majority with 20 to 60-year-olds. Teens and the elderly, however, claim a proportion of 43 and 42 respectively.
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisolls where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 78
- The table below gives information on internet use in six categories by age group.Describe the information in the table and make comparisons where appropriate. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'trend'?
Suggestion: trend
... 70 group. Downloads displays a similar trends with less popularity, from 52% teens to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03184713376 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88300828727 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700636942675 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7210781428 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11296447223 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515011145499 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670194191064 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976895694667 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842507439558 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.