Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view.
In the last couple of decades, group activities are enjoying an upsurge of popularity among the younger generation. This development, I believe is a positive one, as a plethora of recent scientific researches have proved that team activities are excellent in terms of both academic as well as overall development of an individual.
Working in a group, firstly, allows a person to express his or her opinion in front of a team, as a result, there will be debate among the group members which indeed makes a person to think much deeply and critically ultimately leading to improving the critical thinking abilities. Teamwork, secondly, is another important intellectual quality, which naturally is developed only if an individual knows how to work within a team. A recent experiment at Harvard school of psychology on two groups of people, one in a group and another on individuals. The results were clearly in great favor of group work, in terms of both the results and the mental development.
Individual activities, on the other hand, are supported by a certain people, they believe that working in a group does not guarantee best results, rather results in a lot of disturbance as there would be too many inputs from numerous people. This is true to some extent, however, if the group activities are orchestrated and managed by mentors and guides, then the factor of unnecessary disturbance can be ruled out. Furthermore, they assert that each individual has different IQ level and therefore, must be allowed to speed-up the work at his own pace. This reasoning again is not rested on solid-grounds, as in current competitive times, we need professionals and students who can work as a team and help individuals with lesser IQ to be taken along. This is simply due to the fact that, in today’s competitive business environment, the scale of problems and their possible solutions are too complex to be solved by an individual, therefore, there is no doubt about the fact that the teamwork is the only way forward.
From the above argument, it can be concluded that both the scientific studies as well as the past experience prove that working as team undoubtedly enhances our intellectual capabilities and make an individual a leader and a perfect future professional. Therefore, it is high time for both the schools and the society to encourage group activities on higher scales.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-24 | Ronald88 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Rashmi pandey | 55 | view |
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi tech media such as computer software videos and DVDs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 85
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities 79
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 11
- Computers are increasingly used in education In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...are excellent in terms of both academic as well as overall development of an individual. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...cluded that both the scientific studies as well as the past experience prove that working ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...h the scientific studies as well as the past experience prove that working as team undoubtedly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, no doubt, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.040302267 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99621504494 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55919395466 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6735056712 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.923076923 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5384615385 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0897184815278 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033201749701 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325837816911 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514888898575 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365722291956 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.