There are different ways for students to work on assigned projects. Some teachers prefer their students to work individually claiming that they are able to finish work earlier. Other teachers prefer their students to work in groups. Although both of these work tactics are beneficial. In my vantage point, I am more inclined with the latter tactic because of several reasons.
First working in groups enhances the ability of students to express their emotions. Many students hold different views about certain topics however, they are unable to express their emotions clearly either because of poor communication skills, or because they are shy to express their thoughts to the public. Enrolling in group work activities make students more talkative and able to express their ideas thoughtfully. For instance, during my education at the university, I had a case presentation course. The objective of this course was to make students discuss a certain disease, and at the end of the course to present the information on slides as a power point presentation. excitedly, the students participated in the course. and After completing it, I was able to communicated clearly with my colleagues. It was a great experience that I must admit have benefit a lot from it. The course helped to thrive in my first job, and be praised by my supervisors.
Secondly, working in groups help students to be more creative. Many students are unable to come out with new ideas when they think on their own. Working in groups help students to brain storm, and be more creative. On the other hand, working individually does not allow students to learn from the experiences of others. For instance, I have participated in several group meeting with my instructor about ways to protect the environment. Surely, group work was one of the main reasons which helped me to come out with new ideas to maintain a clean environment.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to come to my mind, they are by no means the only reason available. In fact, there is another subtle reason that is worth to be mentioned, which is the noteworthy, refreshingly, intelligibly study published in the school academy journal last year, which showed that students learning in groups are more productive and are able to learn faster than their peers who study individually. The study was conducted on 120 student from different schools to prevent bias.
To sum up, contemplating all the aforementioned points make us confident that working in groups is a more professional approach of learning. By giving the students the opportunity to work in groups, we don't only provide students with educational foundation, but we enhance their chances to succeed in the future.
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altruism 80
- People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things.Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 73
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- 133.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person's childhood years (the time From birth to twelve years of age) are the most important years of a person's life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...refer their students to work in groups. Although both of these work tactics are benefici...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... students discuss a certain disease, and at the end of the course to present the ...
^^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Excitedly
...n slides as a power point presentation. excitedly, the students participated in the cours...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...he students participated in the course. and After completing it, I was able to comm...
^^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...idually. The study was conducted on 120 student from different schools to prevent bias....
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s the opportunity to work in groups, we dont only provide students with educational ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their chances to succeed in the future.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, in fact, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 30.3222958057 257% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 1373.03311258 167% => OK
No of words: 450.0 270.72406181 166% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09555555556 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.04702891845 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87116357021 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 145.348785872 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 419.366225166 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 13.0662251656 191% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9267205943 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.72 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 4.33554083885 369% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850821775543 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289180954537 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266261787224 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049885613329 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259783407436 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.