TPO 42 integrated writing
The passage discusses about millions of birds that get got injured because of bulidings that made up glasses. The passage explains three solutions for solving this problem. However the professor refutes each of author's solutions.
First, the reading claims that by providing regular, clear glass that one side is transparent and the other side is not, they can solve the issue. However the lecture rejects this solution and asserts that by replacing the glasses, birds cannot find any differences. New glasses are similar to mirrors. So, birds are not capable avoid from mirrors.
Second, the text suggests that paint colorful lines on the glasses can solve the problem. While the professor asserts that these lines must be so narrow to prevents birds from flying toward them. Narrowing the lines on the glasses makes inside of the buildings too dark. So, this solution is not practical.
Thord, the text says that by providing an artificial magnetic field they can guide birds away from buildings. However, the conversation rebuts this solution, too. The lecture claims that birds use the magnetic fields for migration and long distance journies not for short distances. The professor continues that birds just use from light and their eys for short communications. Eventually based on the lecture the soloutiens that mentioned in readings are both impractical and useless.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ree solutions for solving this problem. However the professor refutes each of authors s...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... side is not, they can solve the issue. However the lecture rejects this solution and a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s on the glasses can solve the problem. While the professor asserts that these lines ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'prevent'.
Suggestion: prevent
...s that these lines must be so narrow to prevents birds from flying toward them. Narrowin...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50609175167 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9251044038 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.75 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363996331317 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104822738654 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637706789023 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20215917358 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716387417476 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.