Some think it is right to give beggars money on the street while others think it is wrong to do it. What is your stance on this topic? Be sure to include specific details and examples in your response.
Humanitarian actions are what define the hallmark of a person’s general kindness. To give, they say, represents the greatest love of all. We have seen super-wealthy billionaires like the Bill gates, Bezos, and the Buffets donate a significant chunk of their liquidity to charity. That is not to say there are many more unknown people who give to their most next-door neighbors without much fuss. Consequently, I think these actions are of noble motifs, however, I do not think it is advisable to bestow alms to the poor on the street because it encourages laziness and promotes plausible lies.
As the saying goes, do not give a man to fish, teach him how to fish. As cliché as that sentence sounds, it is of utmost importance that we delve a bit deeper into its significance. Giving beggars some change here and there on the street is not veritably a way of aiding them. It merely encourages them to keep begging, thereby making them lazy. We might think we are assisting them but in reality, we are suppressing their creative-thinking ability. For instance, a beggar who genuinely has the moral justification to do so may be a good sales representative in the making; for him to ask for alms is to possess good convincing skills. One could tap into this natural people-skill of his by sending him to the appropriate school. As a result, one would have invariably created a way out of economic and intellectual poverty for someone who never thought it possible. This way, one is being of help by eradicating laziness and creating a means of necessary sustenance.
Additionally, these days we have many people who impersonate by faking as beggars. How can one differentiate between a fake and a genuine beggar on the roadside? One could be giving generously to a deceitful person while the person truly in need of help gets nothing. For example, on my way back from work last week, I saw an angry mob lynching a beggar; he concealed one of his legs in his trousers by flexing the knee and fastening it to his thigh with a rope. This event left a nasty impression on my mind never to trust any beggar. I believe donating to charitable causes is a more practical way of helping because these bodies possess a more valuable experience in dealing with the needy and one is confident the money is being fictitiously unspent.
To put it briefly, helping the needy is a very selfless act to carry out, but I strongly believe learning a trade and donating to people or bodies that can manage these funds efficiently is a better way to render assistance to beggars. This way, you are being of help, but are not encouraging laziness and deceit.
- Some people think that giving beggars money on the street is wrong, while others think it's right. Which idea do you support? Be sure to use specific details and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 76
- Some think it is right to give beggars money on the street while others think it is wrong to do it. What is your stance on this topic? Be sure to include specific details and examples in your response. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "Children aged 15 and above should be allowed to vote". Use specific details and examples to show why you agree or disagree. 76
- Should adults stay in their home communities or they should move out to bigger cities. Which do you support? Be sure to include specific details and examples to support your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72786177106 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86321248185 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548596112311 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0278850853 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0454545455 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152550656729 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436981184872 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384081915007 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085550383873 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368402439927 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.