In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities . others believe the money should be spent on improving exiting public transport.

Essay topics:

In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities . others believe the money should be spent on improving exiting public transport.

Nowadays in several countries, it is argued by some that spending a large amount of money on building new railway lines for quick trains between cities is so essential. However, others think that the money should be spent to enhancing exiting public transportation. I will discuss both views and express my opinion in fallowing essay.
On the one hand, many people claim that investing in constructing rail networks would be more efficient. Time can be saved by using trains because of two reasons. Firstly, these types of trains run faster than other transportation systems. Further and even more importantly, though, there is not wasting time in traffic congestion.
On the other hand, public transportation facilities play a vital role in our daily lives. The highest percentage of citizens use this system to travel to various places. this is why many believe that national budget should be utilized on upgrading the public transport. Moreover, if the government make this system more effective, using privet vehicles would reduce. Also, air pollution can decrease by this way.
By way of conclusion, I personally believe that the money should be distributed for both improvement of the rail and public transports fairly.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-20 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 61 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 61 view
2024-02-03 Wardiati Yusuf 67 view
2023-12-30 Tường Vân 73 view
Essays by user shaghayeghvl2000 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays in several countries, it is arg...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng public transportation. I will discuss both views and express my opinion in fal...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...express my opinion in fallowing essay. On the one hand, many people claim that ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t wasting time in traffic congestion. On the other hand, public transportation...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...is system to travel to various places. this is why many believe that national budge...
^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es would reduce. Also, air pollution can decrease by this way. By way o...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r pollution can decrease by this way. By way of conclusion, I personally belie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vement of the rail and public transports fairly.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 197.0 315.596192385 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24873096447 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81805906229 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664974619289 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4823139981 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5384615385 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1538461538 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372259953033 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107383534796 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118602667778 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220004885589 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126566832691 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.