Due to the importance of discovering management talents at an early age, many experts have suggested allowing students to participate in the decision-making process at school, and despite the objection of some due to academic concerns, I fully support this argument.
It is a well-known fact that children nowadays have little free time at school with most of their day dedicated to academic subjects, and every minute of their free time must be invested correctly. In that regard, including students in their academic institution's decision-making process will not only occupy their free time fully but may also affect the time dedicated to their studies if not monitored carefully.
On the other hand, allowing pupils to partake in their school's management will open new opportunities for them to discover their entrepreneurial spirit and any potential talent for management, and this will be a significant boost to their subsequent professional life, as many careers nowadays will require a degree of leadership skills in the higher positions of the corporate ladder, and honing these skills at an early age will allow the schoolgoers to have a headstart in their careers as they graduate.
Not only is including the future generation in the management process important for their leadership skills, but it is also crucial to develop a plethora of the imperative abilities not usually taught at a typical school, such as problem-solving, teamwork and professional communication. Partaking in school administration will expose the participants to a myriad of situations and challenges that will test and strengthen those skills as they resolve the various problems with the help of the different professionals that would be on hand.
To summarise, what the schoolgoers may lose in time for academic studies by participating in school management is more than made up for by the soft skills they gain and the entrepreneurial spirit they nurture through this process.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33546325879 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11734982613 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523961661342 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 20.2975951904 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.598302093 49.4020404114 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 238.571428571 106.682146367 224% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.7142857143 20.7667163134 215% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124705801115 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665537076859 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265069269476 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783788925957 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207415110189 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.1 13.0946893788 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.82 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 11.3001002004 181% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.58 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.1190380762 194% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.