The table below give information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries on 2002.
The given table illustrates how national people spent their money on various things. Such as, food, drinks, tobacco, clothing, footwear, education as well as free time activity in five different countries in 2002.
At the forst glance, people of different nations spent more on food, drinks and tobacco, while, spent least on study as well as leisure.
In term of nutrients, bavarages and tobacco, Irelands' and Turkeys' people spent 28.91 percent and 32.14 percent respectively, whereas, Italy and sweden spent almost same, but custer of spain spent 18.80 percent, it was more than Italy and Sweden.
For outfit and footwear, expenses of Italy was higher among all five different nations. Italy spent 9.00 percent, to compare with, Ireland, Spain and Turkey spent approximetely 6.50 percent and Sweden spent least on those things. Additionally, all different five countries spent nearly 4 percent except spain, it spent 1.98 percent on education and other activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | meetmiyani123 | 61 | view |
- The table below give information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries on 2002. 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows the how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 84
- Major threats to reefs 77
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'spent the least'.
Suggestion: spent the least
...ore on food, drinks and tobacco, while, spent least on study as well as leisure. In term ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38157894737 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48972959628 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3839600498 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130156440286 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849903894619 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730963492733 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945030309352 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705742366236 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.