In the 21st century, lives of people all over the world has been changed tremendously because luxuries and conveniences prevail in modern life. Although the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life may deteriorate mental and physical health, it stimulates people to become strong and independent individuals. Luxuries and conveniences are disparate issues which should be discussed separately.
Firstly, speaking of luxuries, it reminds people of expensive and designer brands. The existence of luxuries definitely enables people to have more crave to climb up higher ladders in every enterprise. The reason behind it is that most people are thirsty for decent life with spacious houses or apartments, affordable children’s tuition and exquisite suits. To attain it, they must work hard and impeccably and then become more professional in their own industry. Therefore, sumptuous houses, clothes, bags, cars would incentivize them to become competitive and self-dependent.
Secondly, speaking of conveniences, they definitely grant people more opportunities to become stronger and more independent. Convenient devices and wireless network open a new way to people with more knowledge repositories and innovative lifestyles inconceivable to people lived decades ago. For example, in college, current students must finish their essays by surfing on internet and distinguishably sifting valuable information and materials. After dinner, electric dishwashers can help hustled commuters to watch movies with blue light glasses or do jogging with wearable devices which check rate of heartbeat. Internet still aids people, especially those who yearn for recharging in spare time, to learn more at home, therefore they do not need to waste time in travels. Utilizing most of available time is still the best way to become more competitive and irreplaceable. Sorting out useful information, enhancing physical health, and recharging one own attribute to access to conveniences of contemporary life.
Some people rebut that people would be addicted to transient satisfaction and excitement the luxuries and conveniences grant individuals. For example, some people only care about making fortune as much as possible and have promotion instead of pleasure of family affinity bond, ironic result is that people become money monster who only purchase sophisticated and pompous houses and wear LV bags. In addition, some people plunge in playing PC games all days instead of doing outdoor exercise and make virtual friends. However, this is the case if people crave more for luxuries and attach more to conveniences. On the other hand, I would contend that if people can appropriately employ convenience and rightly treat luxuries, these are not demons who would like to erode people’s physical and mental health and accelerate vanity of individuals.
Although the luxuries and conveniences possibly force people to live money-oriented, Only by beholding them rationally and correctly would people become stronger and less dependent.
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 75
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 79
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing."During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than 69
- Issue: the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 79
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in addition, speaking of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2599.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73730684327 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06383475607 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584988962472 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 816.3 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6227319717 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.761904762 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244047111343 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799910116505 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858233386871 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161182485644 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971492172726 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.1639044944 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.