pruning EX4
The reading and lecture are both about trim branches of a tree to improve the tree's health and structure. the author of the reading feels that tree size is stay fixed by crown reduction pruning. the lecture challenges the claims made by the writer. she is of the opinion that poor pruning practice known as topping.
To begin with, the author argues that careful pruning will control the size of the tree. The article mentions that leaving no stubs. this specific argument is challenges by the lecturer that topping doses not keep a tree small she says topping increases a tree’s growth rate.
Secondly, the writer suggests that pruning invigorates trees and keeps them healthy. in the article, it is said that crowded branches never targets for full size. the lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that topping is very stressful for trees.
Finally, the author posits that pruning should enhance the natural shape and beauty of a tree in contrast, the lecturer’s position is that topping destroys a tree’s natural shape.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-21 | mjmohaghegh | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TOEFL Integrated: Altruism:Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, being sure to specifically explain how they cast doubt on points made in the reading 3
- 3top2-1 3
- tpo 28 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
... trim branches of a tree to improve the trees health and structure. The author of the...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... stay fixed by crown reduction pruning. The lecture challenges the claims made by t...
^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...allenges the claims made by the author. she is of the opinion that poor pruning pra...
^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...article mentions that leaving no stubs. this specific argument is challenges by the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...vigorates trees and keeps them healthy. in the article, it is said that crowded br...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, as to, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 1373.03311258 64% => OK
No of words: 172.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11627906977 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50769502589 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 419.366225166 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8915886244 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102306234074 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466242506085 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646014713703 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696290890069 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00639566462784 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.